| Home | Table of Contents | Table of Forms | Law Journals.R | FRCP-Appendix of Forms | Court Rules |
|
|
California Civil Procedure |
Law Students-USL | ||||
|
California Appellate Court |
BankruptcyCode.US | |||||
|
Case Summaries |
iLaw Dictionary.Com | |||||
|
February 25, 2004 |
Constitutional Law |
|
Codes |
| California Courts Directory |
| Family Law |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
California Civil Procedure
California Appellate Court
Case Summaries
February 25, 2004
California Appellate Court Opinions
Case Summaries -February 24, 2004
Date:2004/02/25 Wed PM 12:31:52 CST
[CAL-CASELAW]Daily Opinion Summaries for 02/24/04
========================================================================
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CIVIL PROCEDURE, UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW
* PEOPLE EX REL. LOCKYER v. BRAR
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE
* PEOPLE v. SEIJAS
FAMILY LAW
* RITCHIE v. KONRAD
INJURY AND TORT LAW, INSURANCE LAW, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW, WORKERS'
COMPENSATION
* ROTH v. L.A. DOOR CO.
INSURANCE LAW
* AM. CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY CO. v. SALADINO
========================================================================
CIVIL PROCEDURE, UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW
PEOPLE EX REL. LOCKYER v. BRAR, No. G033116 (Cal. 4th App.
Dist.
February 24, 2004)
This appeal from the decision denying plaintiff's anti-SLAPP claim
is dismissed as patently frivolous. The anti-SLAPP statute
specifically exempts the Attorney General's efforts to make
defendant stop filing lawsuits under California's unfair competition
law.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/callaw?dest=ca/caapp4th/slip/2003/g033116.html
[PDF File]
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/g033116.pdf
PEOPLE EX REL. LOCKYER v. BRAR, No. G033116 (Cal. 4th App. Dist.
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE
PEOPLE v. SEIJAS, No. B160209 (Cal. 2d App. Dist. February
24, 2004)
Defendant's conviction is reversed because the trial court committed
prejudicial error in allowing the prosecution to introduce the
critical preliminary hearing testimony of a witness erroneously
found to be unavailable.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/callaw?dest=ca/caapp4th/slip/2003/b160209.html
[PDF File]
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/b160209.pdf
PEOPLE v.
SEIJAS, No. B160209 (Cal. 2d App. Dist. February 24, 2004)
FAMILY LAW
RITCHIE v. KONRAD, No. B159689 (Cal. 2d App. Dist.
February 24,
2004)
When considering a request to renew a domestic violence protective
order, a trial court should grant the requested extension unless the
request is contested and the judge determines the protected party
does not entertain a reasonable apprehension of future abusive
conduct.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/callaw?dest=ca/caapp4th/slip/2003/b159689.html
[PDF File]
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/b159689.pdf
RITCHIE v.
KONRAD, No. B159689 (Cal. 2d App. Dist. February 24,2004)
INJURY AND TORT LAW, INSURANCE LAW, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW, WORKERS'
COMPENSATION
ROTH v. L.A. DOOR CO., No. G031221 (Cal. 4th App. Dist.
January 23,
2004)
Plaintiff's employer, as an authorized self-insurer for the purpose
of providing workers' compensation insurance, is deemed an "insurer"
providing "other insurance" within the meaning of Insurance Code
section 1063.1(c)(9). Thus its claim is excluded as a "covered
claim" and the California Insurance Guarantee Association is not
responsible for amounts it paid to the plaintiff in workers'
compensation benefits.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/callaw?dest=ca/caapp4th/slip/2003/g031221.html
[PDF File]
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/g031221.pdf
ROTH v.
L.A. DOOR CO., No. G031221 (Cal. 4th App. Dist. January 23,2004)
INSURANCE LAW
AM. CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY CO. v. SALADINO, No. B158573
(Cal. 2d App.
Dist. February 24, 2004)
The court did not err in denying the sureties' request to impose a
lien and for a constructive trust on the funds the special
administrator of decedent's estate delivered to the public
administrator appointed to succeed her.
To read the full text of this opinion, go to:
http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/callaw?dest=ca/caapp4th/slip/2003/b158573.html
[PDF File]
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/b158573.pdf
AM. CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY CO. v. SALADINO, No. B158573 (Cal. 2d App.Dist.
February 24, 2004)
![]()
Opinion Summaries Archive September 2000 to the Present
Click here to browse or search the archive for specific opinions:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casesummary/index.html
FINDLAW DAILY OPINION SUMMARIES
CALIFORNIA APPELLATE DISTRICTS
http://california.lp.findlaw.com/ca12_california_courts/appeal.html
========================================================================

_________________________
Have a BEAUTIFUL DAY!!!!!