l

Filed 5/31/01

 

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

 

COURT OF APPEAL - FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

 

DIVISION ONE

 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

 

MAURICE ALFORD et al.,

 

            Petitioners,

 

            v.

 

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY,

 

            Respondent;

 

  D036869

 

  (San Diego County

  Super. Ct. No. SCD153999)

 

THE PEOPLE et al.,

 

            Real Parties in Interest.

 

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR

REHEARING AND MODIFYING OPINION

 

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

 

 

THE COURT:

            1.  The opinion filed May 22, 2001 is modified as follows:

            The last sentence of the first paragraph on page 25 is modified to read:

Although Love and Alford do not raise any issue in their petition regarding such matter, we address it because of the court's misconceptions about the scope of a valid protective order which may be issued under Evidence Code section 1045, and the petitioners were given the opportunity to reply to such issue, which was raised, and thus joined, by the real parties in interest in their responses.  (See Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 171, 178-180.)

 

            2.  The petition for rehearing in this matter is denied.

            3.  There is no change in the judgment.

 

 

                                                           

HALLER, Acting P. J.